Comments on: Skirty News

By: Mystie

Mystie — Mon, 07 Apr 2008 04:02:26 +0000

Heh. Can I try to con my way out of my guilt by claiming I did that on purpose to see if you’d catch it?

Oh. Ok. I didn’t think so.
When my little girl (currently 3 months) is in a 2-3, she will definitely have to have a skirty as she keeps up with her older brothers! It is a brilliant idea.

By: Missy

Missy — Sat, 05 Apr 2008 13:03:03 +0000

More work for you in your spare time Rebekah: I look at your designs and think they would be beautiful knit or needlepoint patterns, because that is where my mind runs.
Your drawings are just lovely and could be adapted to any number of beautiful crafts.

By: lauren

lauren — Fri, 04 Apr 2008 17:49:51 +0000

Bekah-I don’t yet have a daughter for whom a skirty would be purchased, and I find myself lamenting the fact that my only niece is too old for one, so I will go on a rabbit trail!
Say . . . I love the graphics on your announcement and though it is not necessarily related to clothing, it (what I’m about to say) is related to lovely things: how about an Amoretti Designs stationary set! I love your flowers and backgrounds, and while I’m at it (coming up with projects for other people) I have a soft spot for placards with encouraging/convicting scriptures against a pretty background (just like the “to me to live is Christ” in Mrs. Millers kitchen with a pretty yellow flower offset)? Someday I will buy a skirty.

By: Billie

Billie — Fri, 04 Apr 2008 15:17:12 +0000

lizziejank-

Huh. I thought I had read somewhere that your mom taught Latin at Logos for a while. I must have my mother’s memory! (Which I’ve learned, is full of interesting things, but not all of them actually occurred in the real world!

By: rebekah

rebekah — Fri, 04 Apr 2008 12:31:00 +0000

Good idea Katherine!

Sizes are:

XS (2-3)
S (4-5)
M (6-7)
L (8-9)
XL (10-12)

And the price is $16.00

There you go!

By: Katherine

Katherine — Fri, 04 Apr 2008 12:09:08 +0000

Well said Bekah! Mine IS standing on her head without a skirty! I guess that’s why I didn’t notice the grammar errors when it was first posted. Could you remind me the price and sizes? My daughter is 4 yrs old, 40 inches tall, and 37 lbs. Thanks!

By: Angie

Angie — Fri, 04 Apr 2008 12:00:25 +0000

Okay, sorry–the rest of my comment was cut off. I was going to say…

Not mine–she already has a Skirty!

Anyway, sorry about your technical difficulties. Hope your website is up and running again soon.

By: Angie

Angie — Fri, 04 Apr 2008 11:58:23 +0000

You could just say “loads of girls who should be wearing Skirties.”

>>you might want to turn around and notice that your daughter who is standing on her head as we speak ought to have something on under that dress!

By: Kelly Orr

Kelly Orr — Fri, 04 Apr 2008 11:06:10 +0000

Hooray! I’ve been trying for weeks to figure out how to order a couple!

By: rebekah

rebekah — Fri, 04 Apr 2008 10:16:08 +0000

All right Grammar Girls!

I’ve fixed it. If you would like to have unwieldy clauses like “each of whom” involved in your reading because otherwise you get confused by singulars and plurals, then I will give them to you! (I was going to stick to my guns on the the third one . . . the “one of the group of people who are” section. Clearly the “are” goes with the “people” - if it went with the “one” then there was no point in lugging the group of people into the conversation in the first place. But since I completely walked into it with the meantime and the extra apostrophe then I decided to not be stubborn about it. Godly person that I am.)

But now that you’re not confused anymore by thinking that a group of girls might all be trying to wear the same Skirty, or distracted by misplaced apostrophes, you might want to turn around and notice that your daughter who is standing on her head as we speak ought to have something on under that dress!